Manual and semi-automated drilling
In many cases, full automation, for example through the use of industrial robots, is not an economically viable solution. One reason for this is limited accessibility and the need to parallelize different work steps within the same manufacturing system. Under these conditions, machining can only be performed using manually guided tools. In manual drilling, the position and angle relative to the workpiece, as well as the process execution. Therefore, the resulting machining quality are influenced by the operator. The experience level of the personnel, along with external factors such as ergonomics and individual working methods, leads to high process variability, which is reflected in fluctuations in machining quality. Additionally, process monitoring and documentation are more challenging in manual operations. Process parameters, such as the feed rate in manual drilling, are not clearly defined and are difficult to measure. At the IPMT, approaches are being developed to monitor manual drilling and support operators in their machining tasks.
In contrast to fully manual drilling machines, semi-automatic drilling feed units (ADU) are manually positioned and locked in a drilling template but execute the machining task automatically according to a predefined program. Although process parameters can be specified, the compact design and relatively low drive power of these machines can negatively affect adherence to the correct parameters. Local clamping within the drilling jig promotes deflections and vibrations in the machining system. The drilling tools used must be able to withstand these conditions. The IPMT is therefore engaged in the design and experimental investigation of drilling tools specifically for this type of machine.