Title: Robotic ultrasound-guided SBRT of the prostate: feasibility with respect to plan quality.
Written by: S. Gerlach and I. Kuhlemann and P. Jauer and R. Bruder and F. Ernst and C. Fürweger and A. Schlaefer
in: <em>Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. online first 1-11</em>. Jan (2017).
Volume: <strong>12</strong>. Number: (1),
on pages: 149-159
how published:
Institution: Institute of Medical Technology, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany. schlaefer@tuhh.de.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1455-7
PMID: 27406743

[www] [BibTex] [pmid]


Abstract: Advances in radiation therapy delivery systems have enabled motion compensated SBRT of the prostate. A remaining challenge is the integration of fast, non-ionizing volumetric imaging. Recently, robotic ultrasound has been proposed as an intra-fraction image modality. We study the impact of integrating a light-weight robotic arm carrying an ultrasound probe with the CyberKnife system. Particularly, we analyze the effect of different robot poses on the plan quality.A method to detect the collision of beams with the robot or the transducer was developed and integrated into our treatment planning system. A safety margin accounts for beam motion and uncertainties. Using strict dose bounds and the objective to maximize target coverage, we generated a total of 7650 treatment plans for five different prostate cases. For each case, ten different poses of the ultrasound robot and transducer were considered. The effect of different sets of beam source positions and different motion margins ranging from 5 to 50 mm was analyzed.Compared to reference plans without the ultrasound robot, the coverage typically drops for all poses. Depending on the patient, the robot pose, and the motion margin, the reduction in coverage may be up to 50 \% points. However, for all patient cases, there exist poses for which the loss in coverage was below 1 \% point for motion margins of up to 20 mm. In general, there is a positive correlation between the number of treatment beams and the coverage. While the blocking of beam directions has a negative effect on the plan quality, the results indicate that a careful choice of the ultrasound robot\'s pose and a large solid angle covered by beam starting positions can offset this effect. Identifying robot poses that yield acceptable plan quality and allow for intra-fraction ultrasound image guidance, therefore, appears feasible.

To top