Current Publications

Journal Publications
since 2022

Recent Journal Publications

[76898]
Title: Enlarging the field of view in {Magnetic Particle Imaging} – A comparison. <em>{Magnetic Particle Imaging}</em>
Written by: M. Grüttner, T. F. Sattel, M. Graeser, H. Wojtczyk, G. Bringout, W. Tenner, and T. M. Buzug
in: <em>Springer Proceedings in Physics</em>. (2012).
Volume: Number: (140),
on pages: 249--253
Chapter:
Editor:
Publisher:
Series:
Address:
Edition:
ISBN: 978-3-642-24132-1 978-3-642-24133-8
how published:
Organization:
School:
Institution:
Type:
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_40
URL: http://link.springer.com/chapter/
ARXIVID:
PMID:

[www] [BibTex]

Note: inproceedings

Abstract: {Magnetic Particle Imaging} evolves rapidly and human scanners are conceivable, already. However, the growing scanner size and therefore the increasing data within the field of view give rise to several unsolved problems. The reconstruction process, solving an inverse problem with the measured signal and the system function, is a storage consuming procedure for high resolution 3D imaging. Additionally, the size of the field of view strongly depends on the used gradient field and field amplitudes. Due to technical as well as medical limitations, such as specific absorption rates and peripheral nerve stimulation, the conventional procedures will not be sufficient to image large regions of interest. This paper compares and discusses approaches enlarging the field of view that might be used to reduce the reconstruction process and/or enlarge the field of view despite limited technical properties.

Conference Abstracts and Proceedings
since 2022

Recent Conference Abstracts and Proceedings

[76898]
Title: Enlarging the field of view in {Magnetic Particle Imaging} – A comparison. <em>{Magnetic Particle Imaging}</em>
Written by: M. Grüttner, T. F. Sattel, M. Graeser, H. Wojtczyk, G. Bringout, W. Tenner, and T. M. Buzug
in: <em>Springer Proceedings in Physics</em>. (2012).
Volume: Number: (140),
on pages: 249--253
Chapter:
Editor:
Publisher:
Series:
Address:
Edition:
ISBN: 978-3-642-24132-1 978-3-642-24133-8
how published:
Organization:
School:
Institution:
Type:
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_40
URL: http://link.springer.com/chapter/
ARXIVID:
PMID:

[www]

Note: inproceedings

Abstract: {Magnetic Particle Imaging} evolves rapidly and human scanners are conceivable, already. However, the growing scanner size and therefore the increasing data within the field of view give rise to several unsolved problems. The reconstruction process, solving an inverse problem with the measured signal and the system function, is a storage consuming procedure for high resolution 3D imaging. Additionally, the size of the field of view strongly depends on the used gradient field and field amplitudes. Due to technical as well as medical limitations, such as specific absorption rates and peripheral nerve stimulation, the conventional procedures will not be sufficient to image large regions of interest. This paper compares and discusses approaches enlarging the field of view that might be used to reduce the reconstruction process and/or enlarge the field of view despite limited technical properties.

Publications

Journal Publications
since 2014

Journal Publications

[76898]
Title: Enlarging the field of view in {Magnetic Particle Imaging} – A comparison. <em>{Magnetic Particle Imaging}</em>
Written by: M. Grüttner, T. F. Sattel, M. Graeser, H. Wojtczyk, G. Bringout, W. Tenner, and T. M. Buzug
in: <em>Springer Proceedings in Physics</em>. (2012).
Volume: Number: (140),
on pages: 249--253
Chapter:
Editor:
Publisher:
Series:
Address:
Edition:
ISBN: 978-3-642-24132-1 978-3-642-24133-8
how published:
Organization:
School:
Institution:
Type:
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_40
URL: http://link.springer.com/chapter/
ARXIVID:
PMID:

[www] [BibTex]

Note: inproceedings

Abstract: {Magnetic Particle Imaging} evolves rapidly and human scanners are conceivable, already. However, the growing scanner size and therefore the increasing data within the field of view give rise to several unsolved problems. The reconstruction process, solving an inverse problem with the measured signal and the system function, is a storage consuming procedure for high resolution 3D imaging. Additionally, the size of the field of view strongly depends on the used gradient field and field amplitudes. Due to technical as well as medical limitations, such as specific absorption rates and peripheral nerve stimulation, the conventional procedures will not be sufficient to image large regions of interest. This paper compares and discusses approaches enlarging the field of view that might be used to reduce the reconstruction process and/or enlarge the field of view despite limited technical properties.

Conference Abstracts and Proceedings
since 2014

Conference Abstracts and Proceedings

[76898]
Title: Enlarging the field of view in {Magnetic Particle Imaging} – A comparison. <em>{Magnetic Particle Imaging}</em>
Written by: M. Grüttner, T. F. Sattel, M. Graeser, H. Wojtczyk, G. Bringout, W. Tenner, and T. M. Buzug
in: <em>Springer Proceedings in Physics</em>. (2012).
Volume: Number: (140),
on pages: 249--253
Chapter:
Editor:
Publisher:
Series:
Address:
Edition:
ISBN: 978-3-642-24132-1 978-3-642-24133-8
how published:
Organization:
School:
Institution:
Type:
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_40
URL: http://link.springer.com/chapter/
ARXIVID:
PMID:

[www]

Note: inproceedings

Abstract: {Magnetic Particle Imaging} evolves rapidly and human scanners are conceivable, already. However, the growing scanner size and therefore the increasing data within the field of view give rise to several unsolved problems. The reconstruction process, solving an inverse problem with the measured signal and the system function, is a storage consuming procedure for high resolution 3D imaging. Additionally, the size of the field of view strongly depends on the used gradient field and field amplitudes. Due to technical as well as medical limitations, such as specific absorption rates and peripheral nerve stimulation, the conventional procedures will not be sufficient to image large regions of interest. This paper compares and discusses approaches enlarging the field of view that might be used to reduce the reconstruction process and/or enlarge the field of view despite limited technical properties.

Publications Pre-dating the Institute

Publications
2007-2013

Old Publications

[76898]
Title: Enlarging the field of view in {Magnetic Particle Imaging} – A comparison. <em>{Magnetic Particle Imaging}</em>
Written by: M. Grüttner, T. F. Sattel, M. Graeser, H. Wojtczyk, G. Bringout, W. Tenner, and T. M. Buzug
in: <em>Springer Proceedings in Physics</em>. (2012).
Volume: Number: (140),
on pages: 249--253
Chapter:
Editor:
Publisher:
Series:
Address:
Edition:
ISBN: 978-3-642-24132-1 978-3-642-24133-8
how published:
Organization:
School:
Institution:
Type:
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_40
URL: http://link.springer.com/chapter/
ARXIVID:
PMID:

[www]

Note: inproceedings

Abstract: {Magnetic Particle Imaging} evolves rapidly and human scanners are conceivable, already. However, the growing scanner size and therefore the increasing data within the field of view give rise to several unsolved problems. The reconstruction process, solving an inverse problem with the measured signal and the system function, is a storage consuming procedure for high resolution 3D imaging. Additionally, the size of the field of view strongly depends on the used gradient field and field amplitudes. Due to technical as well as medical limitations, such as specific absorption rates and peripheral nerve stimulation, the conventional procedures will not be sufficient to image large regions of interest. This paper compares and discusses approaches enlarging the field of view that might be used to reduce the reconstruction process and/or enlarge the field of view despite limited technical properties.

Open Access Publications

Journal Publications
since 2014

Open Access Publications

[76898]
Title: Enlarging the field of view in {Magnetic Particle Imaging} – A comparison. <em>{Magnetic Particle Imaging}</em>
Written by: M. Grüttner, T. F. Sattel, M. Graeser, H. Wojtczyk, G. Bringout, W. Tenner, and T. M. Buzug
in: <em>Springer Proceedings in Physics</em>. (2012).
Volume: Number: (140),
on pages: 249--253
Chapter:
Editor:
Publisher:
Series:
Address:
Edition:
ISBN: 978-3-642-24132-1 978-3-642-24133-8
how published:
Organization:
School:
Institution:
Type:
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24133-8_40
URL: http://link.springer.com/chapter/
ARXIVID:
PMID:

[www] [BibTex]

Note: inproceedings

Abstract: {Magnetic Particle Imaging} evolves rapidly and human scanners are conceivable, already. However, the growing scanner size and therefore the increasing data within the field of view give rise to several unsolved problems. The reconstruction process, solving an inverse problem with the measured signal and the system function, is a storage consuming procedure for high resolution 3D imaging. Additionally, the size of the field of view strongly depends on the used gradient field and field amplitudes. Due to technical as well as medical limitations, such as specific absorption rates and peripheral nerve stimulation, the conventional procedures will not be sufficient to image large regions of interest. This paper compares and discusses approaches enlarging the field of view that might be used to reduce the reconstruction process and/or enlarge the field of view despite limited technical properties.